A long time ago, I called a writing buddy for a rejection analysis session. You know, the "what-do-you-think-the-agent-really-means" talk. At the end, she laughs and says, "Whatever you do, don't send a nasty e-mail."
"Um, wasn't planning on it."
Yet, some folks do. Or they rant on their blog.
Which is almost as bad as the published author that trash talks (or trash tweets) the person who gave her a bad review.
First of all, can you say, "Unprofessional?" I knew you could.
Exactly what does the rant, no matter the form, actually accomplish? Besides giving the appearance that you haven't been taking your psych meds?
Nothing, that's what. Absolutely, positively nothing. A rejection is just one person's opinion of your work. ONE person. Your WORK. NOT YOU.
And performing the electronic equivalent of screaming at the agent or editor isn't among Carnegie's methods of winning friends and influencing people.
Did the agent or editor give you some feedback? If you harass him or her, they won't do it again. I'm not making any comments on the respective merits, or lack thereof, on the feedback. That's for you to absorb and evaluate.
But I find it very disturbing that the same people complaining about lack of response from agents and editors are, in many cases, abusing those same agents and editors.
So, to the agents and editors who took the time to offer me their opinon, thank you.
For the rest of you bitching, please kindly shut the fuck up if you can't say something intelligent.
Cool Gus says: How does the US declare war?
1 hour ago